Rh Bill Case Study Essay

There are 6 bills pertaining to productive wellness and/or population management that produce been filed for deliberation in both(prenominal) the House of Representatives and the Senate for the 15th Congress.The most controversial of these bills is House measure nary(prenominal) 96 authored by Rep. Edcel Lagman. House Bill No. 96, also know as the envisiond Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2010, lead cover the following areas* midwives of skilled attendance* emergency obstetric heraldic bearing* access to family readying* enatic death review* family planning supplies as essential medicines* benefits for serious and invigoration-threatening reproductive health conditions* mobile health dread service* mandatory age-appropriate reproductive health and sexuality training* responsibility of local family planning office and certificate of compliance* cogency building of barangay health workers* ideal family size* employers responsibilities* multi- media campaign* implementing mechanisms* reporting requirements* tabu acts* penaltiesThe bill is controversial, as it is being pockd by concerned citizens, especially the pro-life, pro-family and pro-God groups, regardless of creed or religion. The Roman Catholic Church expresses its electrical resistance against the bill on many counts, most especially the procurement and dissemination of family planning supplies for the whole uncouth, when the available evidence from peer reviewed medical journals supports the guesswork that when ovulation and fertilization occur in women taking oral contraceptives (OCs) or utilize intrauterine devices (IUD), post-fertilization personal effects are operative on occasion to clog clinically recognized pregnancy. Hormonal contraceptives and/or IUDs directly affect the endometrium. These effects have been presumed to render the endometrium relatively inhospitable to implantation or to the nutrition of the preembryo or embryo prior to clinical ly recognized pregnancy. These make pills and IUDS abortifacient.pro-life groups, and many professionals in the medical and nursing fields, believe that physicians and policy makers should escort and respect the beliefs of patients who consider human life to be present and blue-chip from the moment of fertilization. Patients should be do fully aware of this information so that they buttocks consent to or refuse the use of insubstantial contraceptives.However, the daub of the Catholic Church and the pro-life groups does not mean that they espouse the pose of natalism at all costs, as if the number of children, in itself, were the unmistakable crisscross of authentic christian matrimonial life.The sexual act, properly exercised within trades union only, is ordained primarily to the propagation of life. If there are reasonable motives for position births, such as serious medical conditions in the mother, or extremum poverty, then the Catholic Church teaches that married coup les may take proceeds of the natural cycles of the reproductive system and use their marriage precisely those generation that are infertile (natural family planning).Other aspects of the bill being contested by concerned citizens include the classification of family planning supplies as essential medicines when their gumshoe/toxicity profile and legal permissibility are questionable. At the same time, more than importance should be given to the prevalent diseases, the top ten atomic number 82 causes of morbidity and mortality in the Philippines, namely, infections such as pneumonia and tuberculosis. Financial resources dispense by foreign donors to assist the Philippine administration programs could actually be better spent towards pursuing health programs targeting communicable diseases than purchasing artificial contraceptives.Very pertinent to the debate roughly reproduction rights is the right to life. The Philippine Constitution says that the State shall equally protec t the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. If artificial contraceptives are medically proven to induce abortion as one of their mechanisms of action, then procurement and distribution of such family planning supplies are unconstitutional and illegal.INTRODUCTIONThe international aid environment has undergone great change in recent years. Internationally, principles of development cooperation. In some countries, courtly society has achieved success in navigating the aid architecture and advocating effectively on behalf of sexual and reproductive health (SRH). In other countries, interacting and participating in key development processes has been more challenging due tolack of sufficient information or evidence to make a strong advocacy matter, and light-colored understanding of terminology and processes, making access and influence difficult.For the past devil years, WHO has supported the AHEAD project (completed in January 2011) implemented through t he German Foundation for World Population (DSW). DSW had provided financial and technical support to well-bred society organisations (CSO) for developing and implementing locally devised advocacy action plans to raise levels of government funding for SRH in terce countries. The countries are Bangladesh, the Philippines and Uganda.This report is a case study from the AHEAD project in Philippines. The case study begins by describing the socio political context in which the AHEAD project was implemented. The context covers three themes an account of civil society movements, situation analysis of sexual and reproductive health and rights and background to the policy environment in the Philippines. The subsequent sections highlighting findings from evaluation of the project including achievements from the implementation of the advocacy action plan, the challenges faced by AHEAD and finally the lessons learned.Literature ReviewThe Reproductive Health Bill (RH Bill) has drawn opposing opinions from different sectors of the society. There are people who propose and support the RH Bill and there are those who strongly oppose it. Some find themselves in a crossroads wherein they agree on certain components of the RH Bill but remain doubtful about the other parts. Moral, economic and political conflicts continue to rise between opposing sectors. The debate goes on and on. The primary goal of the RH Bill is to warrantee universal access to methods and information on birth control and maternal care. There are six bills sharing common goals. There seems to be a general agreement when it comes to maternal and child health care but conflicts have risen concerning the proposal that the private sector and Philippine taxpayers fund the nationwide distribution of family planning devices to help control the countrys population. Meanwhile, the government shall continue giving out information on their uses through health care centers. Issues and arguments PopulationThe Philip pines has the fastest growing population in Southeast Asia. Studies have shown that most pregnancies in the Philippines, especially among the poor, are unplanned. Supporters of the RH bill claim that the increasing population of the country is something that cannot be ignored anymore. RH bill principal author Edcel Lagman said, The Philippine population is growing at a much faster rate than can be sustained by the government or the countrys resources.Lagman said that the Philippines is the only country in Southeast Asia that does not have a national reproductive health bill. Based on studies made by the University of the Philippines (one example here), the country tops the fertility rate in Southeast Asia at 3.3 percent. Following are Malaysia at 2.5 percent and Vietnam at 2.1 percent.