Art History Final

Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol , though separated by nigh 50 years and assorted cultures , produced cunning that spoke essentially to the highest leg the same problems . Their art can be compared in wind layers : a surface stare , a slightly deeper haptic sensation , and , finally a thorough examinationAt a glance , Duchamp and Warhol give up a lot in prevalent . Both lived striking , public lives . They were scandalous artists , who challenged the very arbitrariness of art with their sound . Both of them used common objects in their art , and contextualized them to halt them into doings of art Warhol s silk prints soak upm a very synthetic continuation of Duchamp s ready- do , and his piss-paintings seem a play on Duchamp s fountain . These similarities are coarse generous for intimately people to unwitting ly confuse Duchamp and Warhol , judging them most a worry from the hosts of novel and Postmodern artistsBut those few points inclinationed above are where their commonality ends When winning a closer construe , we then suddenly see , that they are wildly different in lifetimestyle , which leads to differences in work style , which the untrained tenderness misses easily . Duchamp took up art for the sake of art , and never had to do craftwork for a living , while most of Warhol s advance(prenominal) work and or so of his later work is explicitly commercial . Duchamp never make a replica of his father work : he took fall aparticular proposition trouble to control each of them be grotesque . Warhol would draw copies by the hundreds consequently , write would become one of the markers of his work . Even when copying works of others , Duchamp would take the trouble to institute his touch to them - similar the mustache on the Mona Lisa copy .

Warhol , yet when making unique compositions , would turn them into crafts by applying them practically , like making the concealment for John Lennon s CD Menlove Ave Duchamp was never a company gentlemans gentleman : after his first bad beauty salon experience he would never conform to any aesthetic concourse , and he considered the social position of art to be a detriment to it . Warhol constantly had people around , crimson though he was purported to be quiet and laconic , he took part in many social events until the end of his life , and tight died because of the overzealousness of one of his fans . Even when after this incident , he stop collective work , later he would be an aspiration for a whole new generation of artists . Duchamp cared for olive-sized outside of art , and when he stopped caring about art , he started caring about chess . Warhol made a stool for himself in too many media to list . Duchamp was concerned with things , with their creation , and was a great fan of physical science and scientific discoveries . Warhol s favorite subject was simple - nothing . With such great differences , is it any wonder that , at a secondment look , they seem like having similar methods dictated to them by mount , but completely different in themeYet , when we look a third time , and see that the two were indeed concerned...If you fate to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper