Wholistic Visual Cues When Reading

Wholistic Visual Cues When ReadingTo what consequence do we engross wholistic optical cues when practice session? look forers have proposed that idiosyncratics substance abuse the adumbrate practice of a name, center wholistic opthalmic cues, in ocular raillery actualization in tuition. Various methods have been used to investigate interpret in respective(prenominal)s with differing learning abilities. The takeing abilities of young children and individuals with dyslexia have been studied to memorize how this deviates from normally edition adults. The majority of interrogation install the use of wholistic optic cues is most beneficial to individuals with dyslexia (Perea Panadero, 2013) and those in the early poses of learning to read (Ehri, 1995). However, inconsistency between the look into conclusions exist, proposing that wholistic optic cues argon used in coalition with other acknowledgment swear outes.The holistically biased hybrid deterrent examp le (Allen, Wallace Weber, 1995) and the process model (Besner Johnston, 1989) both provide theories for intelligence agency recognition. The holistically biased hybrid model uses each an addressed or an assemb conduct pathway to process dustup, with the addressed pathway creation dominant in normal reading (Allen et al., 1995). This model accounts for both intelligence operation frequency and provides an explanation for reading behaviours when presented with a mixed moorage paradigm, financial support the use of wholistic optical cues in reading (Allen et al., 1995). Alternatively, the process model recognises wrangling using either a familiarity assessment, letter analysis or multi-letter appellation (Besner Johnston, 1989) and rejects the use of wholistic visual cues. The interactive activating model uses similar analytic methods as the process model (McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981), whereby numerous variables of the intelligence information atomic number 18 neat for recognition. The different uses of visual cues was determined by Paap, Newsome and Noel (1984) who concluded that wholistic visual cues ar used in the initial stages of record book recognition and this is then followed by abstract letter identification. Evidence for both of these models have been found and provide secernate for and against the use of wholistic visual cues using a variety of research methods.A method used to research the importance of parole hammer in reading is that of the cloze test, whereby participants must anticipate the upcoming give-and-take. Haber, Haber and Furlin (1983) tried adult reading using cues including name length, envelope skeleton or providing the following give-and-take. They found that participants used the shape envelope to recognise the behind word. The cue provided word length info which decreased the number of alternate applicable talking to. However, the wholistic visual cues did not provide semantic cues, suggesting that other methods of word recognition are required in conjunction with wholistic visual cues. Mirman and Magnuson (2008) sight that words which are semantically similar increase response measure in visual word recognition. These pieces of research support the interactive activating model because it requires the treat of several aspects of the word in reduplicate, including semantics (McClelland Rumelhart, 1983). Fisher and Murray (1987) replicated Haber et al.s (1983) research using children as their participants. No age difference was observed in the use of wholistic visual cues between the ages of 10 to 13 historic period old. However, Johnston, Anderson and Duncan (1991) determined that at 8 years old salient outdoor(a) features meliorate reading accuracy which was not seen at the age of ten. This research therefore suggests that wholistic visual cues may be used more than in reading behaviours when improving reading ability.Naming tasks have been particularly heavy in researching developing reading abilities. Webb, beech, Mayall and Andrews (2006) studied the effects of concealing either the inner or outer sections of words for children. The outer sections of a word elicited more accurate reading ability, whereas inner visual information of words had no influence on the individuals reading behaviours even when accounting for frequency effects. Increased performance when presented with the outer sections of words as opposed to the inner sections was also evidenced by Beech and Mayall (2005). This concluded that individuals process word shape envelopes in visual word recognition, suggesting that wholistic visual cues may play a role in the initial stages of the interactive activating model (Webb et al., 2006). It is also possible to explain the findings using Gestalt theory, proposing that individuals form connections between the outer sections of words in ensnare to prevail up for the missing word sections (Beech Mayall, 2005). The Gestalt t heory provides evidence for the use of wholistic visual cues and it is evident when researching the effects of presenting other sections of words.This was then analysed shape up by presenting only when the upper section of words to normally reading adults. Perea, Comesana and Soares (2012) determined an improved reaction time when upper sections of words were presented. However, this did not put through to pseudo-words, implying that the word must be known in order to have the coveted effect. The decreased reaction time indicates that upper sections of words have more salient cues than lower sections of words, importation they are more representative of the come in word. These pieces of research therefore emphasise the importance of wholistic visual cues in visual word recognition, further research by Pelli, Farell and Moore (2003) contrasted these conclusions. The researchers determined that individuals focus on minor cues in words and collate these for an overall representa tion of the word, contrast the evidence of using wholistic visual cues when reading. Further information other than word shape envelopes must therefore be known in order to accurately process the condition word.An alternative way in which the use of wholistic visual cues has been researched is that of using a mixed carapace paradigm, presenting an array of capital letter and lowercase letters to participants (Coltheart Freeman, 1974). Presenting words in a mixed case format increased reaction measure as well as reducing the recognition of the word, providing evidence for the importance of wholistic visual cues and contradicting the interactive energizing model (Coltheart Freeman, 1974). However, the mixed case paradigm had no influence on the identification of individual letters in this case, supporting the interactive activation model and opposing the use of wholistic visual cues. Besner and Johnston (1989) also found pseudo-words in a mixed case format to be detrimental to r eading ability. This therefore demonstrates the need for the word shape envelope and rejects the interactive activation model ascribable to the reduced reading ability. Allen et al. (1995) used a lexical decision task to compare the reading of lower and mixed cases when given a time constraint on processing. The experiments concluded an increased reaction time for pseudo-words in a mixed case format, indicating the importance of wholistic visual cues in word recognition. Participants struggled to accept or reject pseudo-words presented for 400ms, representing the processing limitations during picayune exposure periods. This research is in line with Allen et al.s (1995) holistically biased hybrid model but contrasts the analytical models, including the process model. The research carried out by Allen et al. (1995) indicates that for the successful completion of lexical decision tasks wholistic visual cues are necessary, meaning that reading methods may adapt to the tasks requiremen ts. This provides an explanation for the spectacular degree of variation seen in the research into the use of wholistic visual cues and shows the richly level of validity of this method due to the replicability of the findings.Further research has led to the suggestion that wholistic visual cues may only be used in circumstances where normal reading behaviour is inhibited. This was recently demonstrated by Perea and Panadero (2013) using a lexical decision task to analyse reading behaviours for adults, children and children with studyal dyslexia. There was no effect on the reaction times for word recognition when pseudo-words were presented as having the same shape as satisfying words for adults and children. However, those with developmental dyslexia were found to be affected by the word shape of pseudo-words (Perea Panadero, 2013), reflecting how wholistic visual cues are used to a different extent. This indicates the use of more analytical processing methods in normal readin g. Lavidor (2011) also found word shape envelopes to be beneficial to individuals with dyslexia. These pieces of research suggest that children and those with dyslexia fixate on particularly salient cues in order to reliably process words (Ehri Wilce, 1985). This again dismisses the word shape conjecture and provides further evidence for the importance of the interactive activation model (McClelland Rumelhart, 1981) during normal reading due to the use of feature analysis. These studies highlight the requirement for top-down processing in normal reading behaviours compared to dyslexia, as the interactive activation model (McClelland Rumelhart, 1981) requires the processing of multiple factors in word recognition.Cognitive processing, including top-down processing, is a spanking part of visual word recognition. interrogation carried out by Yates (2013) provides further evidence with clustering effects that word shape alone has curb influence on normal reading behaviour. If a set of words only differ by a phoneme then word recognition requires a higher level of activation and is neat more slowly (Yates, 2013). This infers that the use of a words shape envelope is influenced by cognitive processing ability. Cognitive processing can again be seen by analysing parafoveal vision. When monitoring eye movements McConkie and Zola (1979) discovered normally reading adults do not detect any changes to manipulations of word shape in parafoveal vision. contrastive evidence by Haber, Haber, Furlin, Paap, Newsome and Noel (1984) determined that when proofreading, participants remained unaware of changes to words unless the word shape envelope was manipulated. An alternative explanation for the lack of evidence for the word shape hypothesis may be that the use of wholistic cues become automated (Webb et al., 2006). Research has proven the importance of the word shape envelope for young readers and dyslexics, however it has not been consistently reported in adults. If word shape is processed in a more automated manner the individuals cognitive load would be significantly reduced (Webb et al., 2006). This reduction would leave behind other, more efficient, reading behaviours to occur. These pieces of research led to the conclusion that wholistic visual cues are important in visual word recognition, however as an individual matures their reading behaviours may be modified.Previous research has found that individuals reading methods change as their reading ability improves. Children initially use wholistic visual cues and then potentially develop more useful reading methods (Perea Panadero, 2013). Research by Seymour and Eldre (1986) determined that in order to read children have to be specifically taught to read each of these words, meaning they are unable to determine the phonological information of a word and as much(prenominal) rely on wholistic visual cues (Webb et al., 2006). This was also supported was Ehri (1995) who draw stages in c hildrens visual word recognition. When children learn to read they wage in sight word reading or logographic reading, meaning that the word is read through memory retrieval. As childrens reading ability develops they learn the relationship of phonemes and graphemes and are thus able to apply this to more complex words in the consolidated alphabetic stage (Ehri, 1995). Research using children is therefore of not bad(p) advantage when focusing on adult reading. The conclusion has been reached that as children develop their reading ability they bolt down their use of wholistic visual cues. Thus as visual word recognition becomes more refined individuals use other recognition strategies in parallel with wholistic visual cues.Research into the use of wholistic visual cues has shown that adults do not unavoidably use wholistic visual cues. However, evidence has shown that children and individuals with developmental dyslexia use these cues to a great extent. This difference may occur d ue to the processing of wholistic visual cues becoming more automated as reading develops. Alternatively, the varying use of wholistic cues may be explained by the demands of the task, as shown by lexical decision tasks (Allen et al., 1995). For this tenableness wholistic visual cues provide a more accurate account of visual word recognition when taken in conjunction with analytical models, such as the interactive activation model and the process model.ReferencesAllen, P. A., Wallace, B., Weber, T. A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. daybook of data-based Psychology Human recognition and Performance, 21(4), 914-934.Beech, J. R., Mayall, K. A. (2005). The word shape hypothesis re-examined Evidence for an external feature advantage in visual word recognition. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 302-319.Besner Johnston (1989) Beech MColtheart Freeman (1974) AllenEhri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learn ing to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116-125.Ehri Wilce (1985) LavidorFisher Murray (1987) WebbHaber, L. R., Haber, R. N., Furlin, K. R. (1983). Word length and word shape as sources of information in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(2), 165-189.Haber, Haber, Furlin, Paap, Newsome Noel (1984) Beech MayallJohnston, Anderson Duncan (1991) Beech MLavidor, M. (2011). Whole-word shape effect in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 443-454.McClelland and Rumelhart (1981)McConkie, G. W., Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics, 25(3), 221-224.Mirman Magnuson (2008) yatesSeymoure Eldre (1986) WebbPaap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shapes in poor shape for the zip to the lexicon. Journal of experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 413-428.Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., Moore, D. C. (2003). The remarkable inefficien cy of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752-756.Perea, M., Comesana, M., Soares, A. P. (2012). Does the advantage of the upper part of words occur at the lexical level? Memory and Cognition, 40, 1257-1265.Perea, M., Panadero, V. (2013). Does viotin activate violin more than viocin? On the use of visual cues during visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 23-29.Webb, T. M., Beech, J. R., Mayall, K. M., Andrews, A. S. (2006). Its whats on the outside that matters An advantage for external features in childrens word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 163-181.Yates, M. (2013). How the clustering of phonological neighbours affects visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39(5), 1649-1656.